They're wrong. It's based on turnout, not total registered voters. Their lawyers are going to say it's not this, it's that; our lawyers will disagree. And we believe, if anyone takes it to court, our lawyers would prevail.

This is a two-heat race. If you don't win the prelims, you don't get to run the finals.

We plan to make an announcement (this) week.

He can't outspend us, he doesn't have a grass-roots network like ours, and he's got no credibility on the issues. So how does that make him a front-runner?

If they want to criticize us for having only one opinion on an issue instead of two or three, we'll take it.